Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende ÜberarbeitungNächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | ||
en:wettspiele:turniereundgolfwochen:drucken:jahreseclectic [2020/03/25 16:58] – [Annual Eclectic] emilia | en:wettspiele:turniereundgolfwochen:drucken:jahreseclectic [2022/06/22 10:14] (aktuell) – ↷ Links angepasst weil Seiten im Wiki verschoben wurden msp | ||
---|---|---|---|
Zeile 12: | Zeile 12: | ||
These considerations are all important. Do you want a comparison under the same conditions? | These considerations are all important. Do you want a comparison under the same conditions? | ||
Or you want different par values to be taken into account in the calculation? | Or you want different par values to be taken into account in the calculation? | ||
- | **//Further options are available from Pcc version 01.09.18. Read [[de:wettspiele: | + | **//Further options are available from Pcc version 01.09.18. Read [[de:turniere: |
- | {{:de: | + | {{:en: |
- | - Use the **//Select //** (F2) button to define the tournaments that need to be factored for the eclectic. \\ {{:de: | + | - Use the **//Select //** (F2) button to define the tournaments that need to be factored for the eclectic. \\ {{:en: |
- **// | - **// | ||
- Choose the **//Playing form//**; you have the options: " | - Choose the **//Playing form//**; you have the options: " | ||
Zeile 36: | Zeile 36: | ||
After clicking on **// | After clicking on **// | ||
- | {{:de: | + | {{:en: |
Here, you can enter an individual header that is also saved with the eclectic definition. | Here, you can enter an individual header that is also saved with the eclectic definition. | ||
Zeile 44: | Zeile 44: | ||
Confirm the information by clicking **//OK://** | Confirm the information by clicking **//OK://** | ||
- | {{:de: | + | {{:en: |
Please make sure that the __handicaps__ in the Hcp column are set according to the // | Please make sure that the __handicaps__ in the Hcp column are set according to the // | ||
- | {{:de: | + | {{:en: |
The different presentation of individual results is a visual indication of particular results, therefore you can see clearly on the stroke play score: | The different presentation of individual results is a visual indication of particular results, therefore you can see clearly on the stroke play score: | ||
Zeile 63: | Zeile 63: | ||
If several annual eclectics are held in your club, for example, individual eclectics for the women and the men, we recommend that you save each setting under a specific name. You start the saving process with the **// | If several annual eclectics are held in your club, for example, individual eclectics for the women and the men, we recommend that you save each setting under a specific name. You start the saving process with the **// | ||
- | Please save TEXTS on the server | + | Please save TEXTS in the PC CADDIE |
You can re-open the score with **// | You can re-open the score with **// | ||
Zeile 78: | Zeile 78: | ||
This function is also recommended for 9-hole competitions! | This function is also recommended for 9-hole competitions! | ||
- | {{:de: | + | {{:en: |
- | {{:de: | + | {{:en: |
===== Play-off===== | ===== Play-off===== | ||
Zeile 93: | Zeile 93: | ||
However, since a large number of tee and course data variants have developed over the years, there is now the possibility to create an eclectic evaluation with different par values for the players. **//This evaluation only makes sense if you only use the values of the tournament days for the calculation without factors and without a key date //**. The place shown on the top of the list is still the 1st place or tee, even if the differences between the places involved are calculated. | However, since a large number of tee and course data variants have developed over the years, there is now the possibility to create an eclectic evaluation with different par values for the players. **//This evaluation only makes sense if you only use the values of the tournament days for the calculation without factors and without a key date //**. The place shown on the top of the list is still the 1st place or tee, even if the differences between the places involved are calculated. | ||
- | {{:de: | + | {{:en: |
==== Example for " | ==== Example for " | ||
Zeile 99: | Zeile 99: | ||
The HCP column shows the handicaps for the first tournament played in the series are printed out, but the respective game handicaps are always used. This setting also takes into account different par values for the tees involved; the best Stableford result per hole is then determined. | The HCP column shows the handicaps for the first tournament played in the series are printed out, but the respective game handicaps are always used. This setting also takes into account different par values for the tees involved; the best Stableford result per hole is then determined. | ||
- | {{:de: | + | {{:en: |
==== Example " | ==== Example " | ||
Zeile 106: | Zeile 106: | ||
The different par values are also taken into account; for the individual holes, however, the difference is printed out to the Stableford points, which would have to be played for the played HCP for the individual holes.. This means that -1 is an underplay of 1 Stableford point, +1 is bogey, 0 is par, etc. | The different par values are also taken into account; for the individual holes, however, the difference is printed out to the Stableford points, which would have to be played for the played HCP for the individual holes.. This means that -1 is an underplay of 1 Stableford point, +1 is bogey, 0 is par, etc. | ||
- | {{:de: | + | {{:en: |
===== Example of a Jab Anstoetz score ===== | ===== Example of a Jab Anstoetz score ===== | ||
Zeile 117: | Zeile 117: | ||
* Type " | * Type " | ||
- | {{:de: | + | {{:en: |
To determine the winner after a tie in the playoffs according to the description from 2012, use the Blind Hole scoring method by simply scoring the most difficult hole, and then the two most difficult holes in case of another tie, and so on... | To determine the winner after a tie in the playoffs according to the description from 2012, use the Blind Hole scoring method by simply scoring the most difficult hole, and then the two most difficult holes in case of another tie, and so on... | ||
Zeile 134: | Zeile 134: | ||
* In the groups, enter the required people for the respective net score (A, B, and C); you must print a separate list for each class. Please make sure that the HCP from the last match day is being used for the division of the net classes. Therefore, //**it is absolutely necessary that this list is only created on this day (before a possible completion of a tournament with handicap) because the person filter could become incorrect at a later time**//. | * In the groups, enter the required people for the respective net score (A, B, and C); you must print a separate list for each class. Please make sure that the HCP from the last match day is being used for the division of the net classes. Therefore, //**it is absolutely necessary that this list is only created on this day (before a possible completion of a tournament with handicap) because the person filter could become incorrect at a later time**//. | ||
- | {{:de: | + | {{:en: |
- | {{:de: | + | {{:en: |
Use the Blind Hole scoring method to determine the winner after a tie in the playoffs according to the regulations, | Use the Blind Hole scoring method to determine the winner after a tie in the playoffs according to the regulations, |